Review Article
Partner Violence in the Military: A Call to Action
Keith Klostermann1* and Theresa Mignone2
1Medaille College, USA
2Enlightened Therapies of Western New York, USA
*Corresponding author: Keith Klostermann, Medaille College, 18 Agassiz Circle, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA, Email:
kck35@Medaille.edu
Submitted: 05 February 2019; Accepted: 17 April 2019; Published: 19 April 2019
Cite this article: Klostermann K, Mignone T (2019) Partner Violence in the Military:
A Call to ActionJ Addict Med Ther 3: 3.
Considerable research exists for the prevalence of intimate partner violence in civilian couples, though the opposite is true for married
or cohabitating couples consisting of active duty soldiers or veterans. Since its start, more than 2.5 million United States Military Veterans
have served in the Global War on Terror (Operations Enduring and Iraqi Freedom). The high rates of combat exposure among military
personnel serving in Iraq and Afghanistan (as high as 90%), and high-profile homicides among military personnel and their intimate
partners have led to concern by military and civilians regarding the impact of combat exposure and military member psychological wellbeing
on marital stability and IPV. Military personnel are exposed to unique stressors that can contribute to risk factors associated with
increased IPV. Thus far, prevention and treatment programs for military personnel and their families are based off of programs used within
the civilian community. Results of the effectiveness of these treatments within the military are discouraging at best. This review examines
risk factors of IPV within the military and overviews treatment. Additionally, lack of confidentiality within the military will be examined.
Keywords:Partner violence; Military veterans; Homicides; Domestic violence
Considerable research exists for the prevalence of intimate
partner violence in civilian couples, though the opposite is true
for married or cohabitating couples consisting of active duty
soldiers or veterans. Since its start, more than 2.5 million United
States Military Veterans have served in the Global War on Terror
[1].The high rates of combat exposure among military personnel
serving in Iraq and Afghanistan [2], (as high as 90%; and highprofile
homicides among military personnel and their intimate
partners [3], have led to concern by military leaders and civilian
researchers regarding the impact of combat exposure and
military member psychological well-being on marital stability
and IPV. Because the military is the second largest employer
in the United States with over 1.4 million active duty members
and over 1.1 Reservists and National Guard personnel [4], the
significance of intimate partner violence cannot be minimized.
Military employment provides institutional benefits
including family housing allotments, medical coverage, and stable
employment. Yet, economic struggles, time pressures, and job
strain are inevitable, as with civilian families. In addition to these
factors, military families experience a unique set of stressors
on family systems including: frequent transfers to sometimes
undesired relocations, separation from immediate and extended
family members, uncertainty about future assignments, varying
schedules, long hours, strenuous training and physically demanding jobs, repeated deployments throughout the course
of separation, and fears for the military member’s safety [5,6].
Taken as a whole, these factors may be associated with increased
likelihood of partner violence due to their strain on military
members and their family units. Because service members
and their families may be exposed to numerous psychological
risks which potentially tax the family system and increase risk
for marital instability and related problems [7], increased
understanding of these families may be important for prevention
and intervention efforts.
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a widespread public health
concern impacting social, ethnic, and socioeconomic domains
and affecting over 40 million individuals at least once during
their lifetime. The term “intimate partner violence” encompasses
physical and sexual violence, stalking, and psychological
aggression by a present or prior intimate partner (Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2016). Among the various
negative implications for partners and families are economic,
emotional, physical, and social consequences; this is especially
worrisome considering the stressors experienced by military
families discussed above [8].
There has surprisingly been little research on risk factors
for IPV within military personnel. Most of the available research
has focused on civilian couples. While some of these risk factors
may overlap, military personnel are exposed to unique stressors
that may contribute to incidents of IPV [9]. In fact, many military
personnel have been exposed to high levels of stress over the
past 15 years as a result of the global War on Terror [10]. There
is some initial evidence that other military specific variables
might also be important factors to consider in moderating and/
or mediating IPV, for example, longer periods of deployment
increase the risk of more severe forms of IPV within 1-year of
post-deployment [9].
Researchers Rodrigues et al., sought to review and synthesize
the available research on risk factors of IPV within the military. Results of their study indicated that PTSD is an important link
between trauma-related factors, for example, combat exposure as
well as IPV. More severe symptoms of IPV may also be associated
with depression, hyperarousal, quantity of alcohol use, and
experiencing abuse or maltreatment as a child [9,10]. Alcohol
use is another risk factor often present in more severe forms of
violence [10]. Smither-Marek et al., conducted a meta-analysis
to see if risk factors differ between civilian and military couples
and found important gaps in the research agenda, with more
focus on active duty males than females. Variable results have
been found regarding the effect of deployment as a risk factor
for IPV. However, it can be concluded that there is a small, but
significant increase in self-reported severe spousal aggression
in U.S Army soldiers 1-year post deployment [10]. Relational
problems are also a risk factor for IPV in military samples, with
newer marriages or relationships increasingly the likelihood that
IPV will occur [10].
Examination of risk markers for IPV among the military male
population compared to the civilian male population show there
are more similarities than differences in strength of risk factors
for IPV between male civilian and male military personnel [10].
There may be factors at the contextual level that will attribute to
group differences. It is clear that more research is needed in the
area of IPV risk factors for military personnel particularly among
female soldiers and veterans.
Treatment should focus on the individual variables that
may have led to IPV. For example, PTSD is a risk factor for IPV,
and should be explicitly addressed during treatment. There are
several routes of treatment that are effective for IPV. Entering
therapy (individual or couples) prior to active duty, during
active duty (nonmilitary) partner, and post active duty is highly
recommended to decrease the chance of IPV or if IPV is present,
to work towards eliminating maladaptive behaviors and learning
healthier ways to resolve conflict [11]. Evidence shows that
service members who experience deployment are at risk for
lower relationship satisfaction, and high levels of separation
or divorce. Implementing relationship-focused prevention and
treatments for this group can decrease the likelihood of IPV
starting in the first place [12].
Developing effective prevention and treatment programs
for military members and their families is extremely important
considering the high stress military members have been exposed
to over the past 15 years [10]. The United States Department
of Defense (DOD) has allocated funds and resources towards
prevention and treatment programs for military members
and their families [10]. Most of these programs are based on
programs offered in the general community. However, in order
for these programs to be successful, they must take into account
the unique risk factors for IPV in the military. Programs should
then be adapted to the unique risk factors that military personnel
experience. Unfortunately, research on the availability and effect
of IPV treatment programs for military personnel is limited [9].
Individual or couples therapy (depending on the severity of violence) focused on relationship stability, healthy conflict
resolution, and clear communication prior to active duty, during
active duty (non-military partner), and post-duty is currently
recommended to lessen the chance of the development of IPV
[11]. The challenge for researchers and clinicians is in adapting
current effective treatments for IPV in civilian populations for
use with members of the military, with particular attention
paid to the uniqueness of working with active duty and veteran
populations. Treatment may involve providing psychoeducation,
offering support/resources, and recommending peer support
groups [11].
Although individual-based treatment is the most common
modality used, couples therapy has been found to be equally
to more effective for treating couples in which the violence is
bidirectional, mild, and not being used as a form of power and
control [13]. This format of treatment teaches partners important
skills to solve problems, manage anger, and resolve conflict [11].
Reports of suspected domestic violence are expected of all
military personnel (except chaplains), regardless of how the
suspicions arise or whether the victim wants this information to
be communicated to the command and others. However, many
victims are reluctant to report incidents due to fear of negative
career consequences for their partner, particularly since the
person notified of the violence is considered the person’s boss
[8]. In addition, there may also be career implications for the
perpetrator if he or she is convicted of a domestic-violence
related offense with consequences ranging from reassignment to
discharge. Relatedly, criminal conviction of even a misdemeanor
involving IPV can end a military career and impact individuals’
ability to possess firearms. Finally, higher ranking active duty
females may be reluctant to report partner abuse out of fear
over the stigma attached to being perceived as a victim and the
professional and career implications of this decision. This may
also hold true for male victims of female batterers; men may
be reluctant to report partner violent episodes due to fear of
negative perception. Along these lines, the results of two recent
studies revealed that among persons diagnosed with PTSD, many
will not engage in treatment because of the perceived stigma
attached to the mental health process [14]. These results seem to
provide evidence that there is a strong stigma attached to helpseeking
behavior.
Partner violence is a tremendous public health concern.
Given the unique stressors associated with military service
(deployment, financial and emotional strain, trauma, etc.), active
duty and veteran populations are at increased risk for partnerviolent
behavior. Moreover, institutional barriers may also serve
to limit the likelihood of help-seeking behaviors because of threat
of reprisal, negative stereotype around seeking help, or potential
negative career consequences to the perpetrator. Further study is
needed to determine how to best engage those in need of services
as well as to identify specific treatments which may be helpful.